Mitchell v. Hamilton et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2017cv00150 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2017)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/7/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
Mitchell v. Hamilton et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ESTEVERNICO A. MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. DARRYL HAMILTON, JOSEPH HEADLEY, and STEVEN T. MARSHALL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:17-CV-150-WKW [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 7th day of April, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.