Jenkins v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2017cv00007 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 16 ) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 12 ) is denied. This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/16/2017. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jenkins v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT T. JENKINS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv7-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. In the motion, plaintiff, a state prisoner, requests a preliminary injunction ordering defendants to change custody. his security classification to minimum There are no objections to the recommendation that the motion be denied. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court has concluded that the recommendation should be adopted. *** Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 16) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 12) is denied. This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 16th day of May, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
