Clegg v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD)(CONSENT), No. 2:2016cv00782 - Document 24 (M.D. Ala. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) Plf's 19 & 20 motions to dismiss are GRANTED; and 2) Plf's claims against Dfts Siddiq and Duffell as described herein are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Clegg v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD)(CONSENT) Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JEFFREY S. CLEGG, #276 457, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR TAHIR SIDDIQ, Defendant. * * * * * CASE NO. 2:16-cv-782-TFM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-930-TFM * JEFFREY SCOTT CLEGG, #276457, Plaintiff, v. JESSICA DUFFELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court are Plaintiff’s motions to dismiss some of his claims against the named defendants. See Docs. 19, 20. In the motions, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss his claim that Defendant Siddiq prescribed neomycin so it would not heal and cure the infection in Plaintiff’s eye. Plaintiff also seeks to dismiss his claim against Defendant Duffell that she did not provide him with enough baby shampoo (per volume) with which to wash and clean his eyes. Id. Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motions to dismiss (Docs. 19, 20) are GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Siddiq and Duffell as described herein are DISMISSED without prejudice. Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 21st day of February 2017. /s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
