Slater v. Askew et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2016cv00672 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The 11 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) The 7 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/4/2016. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Slater v. Askew et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DEMON VICTORELL SLATER, Plaintiff, v. CHAPLAIN ASKEW, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv672-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit complaining of violations of his First Amendment right to freedom of religion. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. There are no objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 11) is adopted. Dockets.Justia.com (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 7) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 4th day of November, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
