Steiger v. Strickland et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2016cv00594 - Document 72 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION. Before the court is petitioner's 70 Motion for Reconsideration, which the court construes as objections to the recommendation. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/16/2016. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Steiger v. Strickland et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 72 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL STRICKLAND, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv594-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit seeking habeas relief. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that petitioner’s writ petition be dismissed without prejudice because he has failed to exhaust state remedies. Also before the court is petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (doc. no. 70), which the court construes as objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, including petitioner’s response to the order to show cause (doc. no. 65), the court Dockets.Justia.com concludes overruled that and petitioner’s the magistrate objections judge’s should be recommendation adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 16th day of December, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
