Smith v. U.S. Agencies (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+), No. 2:2016cv00218 - Document 13 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that (1) Plaintiff Peter James Smiths federal claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED with pr ejudice, and judgment is ENTERED on those federal claims in favor of Defendant U.S. Agencies and against Plaintiff Peter James Smith; and (2) Plaintiff Peter James Smiths state law claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED without prejudic e pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/14/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
Smith v. U.S. Agencies (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+) Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PETER JAMES SMITH, Plaintiff, v. U.S. AGENCIES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-218-WKW FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that (1) Plaintiff Peter James Smith’s federal claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED with prejudice, and judgment is ENTERED on those federal claims in favor of Defendant U.S. Agencies and against Plaintiff Peter James Smith; and (2) Plaintiff Peter James Smith’s state law claims against Defendant U.S. Agencies are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 14th day of December, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.