Walker v. Arnold (INMATE 2), No. 2:2016cv00187 - Document 76 (M.D. Ala. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The 75 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The plf's 74 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice; 4) No costs are taxed; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (alm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walker v. Arnold (INMATE 2) Doc. 76 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALFONZO WALKER, #270727, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA ARNOLD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv187-ECM [WO] OPINION and ORDER On August 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 75) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. No costs are taxed. A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. DONE this 17th day of September, 2018. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
