East v. Siddiq (INMATE 1), No. 2:2016cv00043 - Document 4 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1) The 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED; 2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to comply with an order of this court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/23/2016. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
East v. Siddiq (INMATE 1) Doc. 4 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DERRICK L. EAST, #233351, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DR. SIDDIQ, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-43-WHA (WO) OPINION and ORDER On March 1, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation dismissing this case without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the requisite fees upon initiation of this case or provide the court with financial information to determine whether he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis as required by an order of the court. No timely objections have been filed to this Recommendation. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of this court. An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered separately. DONE this 23rd day of March, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
