Broadhead v. Scott et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2016cv00017 - Document 3 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 2 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/4/2016. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Broadhead v. Scott et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 3 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES M. BROADHEAD, #224802, Plaintiff, v. NURSE Y. SCOTT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-17-WHA ) (WO) ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On January 13, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation denying Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing this case without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the full filing fee upon initiation of this case (Doc. # 2). No timely objections have been filed to this Recommendation. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Final Judgment will be entered separately. Done, this 4th day of February, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
