Chillous v. Berryhill (CONSENT), No. 2:2016cv00001 - Document 16 (M.D. Ala. 2017)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Commissioner and agains t the Plaintiff Arthur Chillous and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/31/17. Also mailed to SSA Chief Judge and SSA Office of Hearings and Appeals.(djy, )

Download PDF
Chillous v. Berryhill (CONSENT) Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR CHILLOUS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) NANCY A BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security ) ) Defendant. ) CASE NO.2:16-cv-0001-TFM [wo] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Commissioner and against the Plaintiff Arthur Chillous and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 31st day of March, 2017. /s/ Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.