Noe v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2015cv00888 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/8/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
Noe v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WOODBURCK NOE, Petitioner, v. LEON FORNISS, et al., Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv888-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner filed this habeas-corpus case. court on Magistrate dismissed the This lawsuit is now before the recommendation Judge without that this of the United habeas-corpus prejudice because States request petitioner failed to comply with the orders of the court. before the court recommendation. review of petitioner’s the are petitioner’s After record, objections an objections independent the should court be and be has Also to the de novo concludes that overruled and the magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 8th day of February, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.