Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al (MAG2), No. 2:2015cv00787 - Document 72 (M.D. Ala. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) That the 71 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) That the dft's 57 motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (alm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al (MAG2) Doc. 72 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL POSEY, Plaintiff, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv787-ECM OPINION On August 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 71). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Done this 17th day of September, 2018. /s/Emily C. Marks UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
