Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2015cv00638 - Document 202 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 96 ) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc. no. 100 ) are denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judgefor further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/20/2016. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 202 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MAURICE BULLOCK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN STRICKLAND, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv638-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a motion to compel injunctive relief challenging the sufficiency of his access to the law library and legal materials. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that these motions be denied. There are no objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 96) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc. no. 100) are denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 20th day of December, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
