Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2015cv00638 - Document 196 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 145 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminarily injunction (doc. no. 116 ) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/21/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 196 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MAURICE BULLOCK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN STRICKLAND, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv638-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction administration of seeking certain to stop medication. the This forced case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. objections to the recommendation. There are no Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted; this case raises some serious issues that would be better Dockets.Justia.com addressed on a more complete record, rather than on a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 145) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 116) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 21st day of November, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.