Thomas v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2015cv00470 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 24 objection to the recommendation is overruled; 2) The 22 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) The 3 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/31/2015. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL K. THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DR. RAHMING, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United plaintiff’s denied. States motion Also Magistrate for before preliminary the court objection to the recommendation. is Judge that injunction the the be plaintiff’s Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The objection (doc. no. 24) the United to the recommendation is overruled. 2. The recommendation of Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 22) is adopted. States 3. The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 3) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 31st day of August, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
