Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2015cv00372 - Document 73 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 66 ) is adopted. (2) The motion and amended motion for preliminary injunction (doc. nos. 33 & 55 ) are denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/16/2015. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 73 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KENNETH S. TRAYWICK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv372-MHT (WO) CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary retaliation motion. injunction by prison This case seeking staff. is He before protection later the from amended court on the the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied, as the motion seeks relief not sought in the complaint. recommendation. There are no objections to the Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: Dockets.Justia.com (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 66) is adopted. (2) The motion and amended motion for preliminary injunction (doc. nos. 33 & 55) are denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 16th day of November, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
