Moore v. Pryor et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2015cv00037 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 20 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted. (2) The plaintiff's 8 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/30/2015. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Moore v. Pryor et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SAMUEL MOORE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER JOHN PRYOR and OFFICER BLACKMON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv37-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s injunction be denied. sought to be moved motion for a preliminary In his motion, the plaintiff from Easterling Correctional Facility to another prison due to alleged harassment and threats by correctional officers in retaliation for plaintiff’s lawsuits. recommendation. There are no objections to the In addition, in another case brought by the plaintiff that is currently pending before the Dockets.Justia.com court, Moore v. Brooks, civil action no. 2:15cv62-MHT (M.D. Ala.), the record reflects that the plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at Easterling. *** Accordingly, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED that: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 20) is adopted. (2) The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 8) is denied. DONE, this the 30th day of April, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
