Oliver v. Strange et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2015cv00022 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; (2) the 2 motion to Proceed in forma paupe ris is denied; (3) this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/20/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF

Oliver v. Strange et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 5 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MR. MICHAEL DARNELL OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL LUTHER STRANGE, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv22-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 3) is adopted. (2) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2) is denied. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 20th day of February, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.