Davis v. Reynolds (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+), No. 2:2015cv00012 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion enteredon this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE ofthe court as follows: (1) plaintiff's 11 objections are overruled; (2) the 9 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/26/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Davis v. Reynolds (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. SIBLEY G. REYNOLDS, Circuit Court of Chilton County, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv12-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 11) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 9) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 26th day of January, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
