Davis v. Hardesty (MAG+), No. 2:2015cv00011 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 9 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 7 Recommendation is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/26/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Davis v. Hardesty (MAG+) Doc. 12 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. RHONDA JONES HARDESTY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv11-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 9) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 26th day of January, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
