Martin v. Harris (INMATE 2)(DISCOVERY), No. 2:2014cv01184 - Document 31 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) The plaintiff's objection (doc. no. 30 ) is overruled; (2) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 29 ) is adopted; (3) Plaintiff's motion for order to show cause (doc. no. 27 ) is treated as a motion for preliminary injunction and is denied; (4) This cause is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on May 18, 2015. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SILAS MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER IRVIN HARRIS, in his official and individual capacity, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1184-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause, seeking issuance of a preliminary injunction, be denied. court is the plaintiff’s Also before the objection. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The overruled. plaintiff’s objection (doc. no. 30) is 2. The recommendation of the magistrate for order judge (doc. no. 29) is adopted. 3. Plaintiff's motion to show cause (doc. no. 27) is treated as a motion for preliminary injunction and is denied. 4. This cause is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. DONE, this the 18th day of May, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson_____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
