Davis v. Jackson (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+), No. 2:2014cv01064 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7 ) is adopted; (2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 10 ) is denied as moot, and that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 01/13/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Davis v. Jackson (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+) Doc. 12 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SADAKA T. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HOLLIS JACKSON, III, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1064-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted. (2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 10) is denied as moot, and that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment Dockets.Justia.com pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 13th day of January, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
