Lowe, et al. v. United States Department of Justice, et al. (MAG+), No. 2:2014cv01056 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's objections (Docs. 7 , 8 , 9 ) are OVERRULED; 2. The 6 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and 3. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/6/2015. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PHILLIPPI S. LOWE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEP’T OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1056-WKW ORDER Before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 6) to which Plaintiff has filed objections (Docs. # 7–9). Based upon an independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s objections (Docs. # 7–9) are OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation (Doc. # 6) is ADOPTED; and 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately. DONE this 6th day of January, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
