Davis v. Roebuck et al(MAG+), No. 2:2014cv01001 - Document 11 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 9 ) is adopted. (2) This lawsuit is dismisse d without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/26/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
Davis v. Roebuck et al(MAG+) Doc. 11 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SADAKA T. DAVIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM ROEBUCK, and TITLE MAX AND PAWN OF CLANTON #1, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1001-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 9) is adopted. (2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment Dockets.Justia.com pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 26th day of November, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson___ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.