Childers v. Clanton Police Dept. et al(MAG+), No. 2:2014cv00985 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, In accordance with the memorandum opinion enteredthis date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of thecourt as follows: (1) plf's 11 motion for status is construed as objections to the US Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Re commendation; (2) plf's 11 objections are overruled; (3) the 8 report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (4) this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf for which executi on may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/7/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Childers v. Clanton Police Dept. et al(MAG+) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LESLIE RENEE CHILDERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CLANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv985-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s motion for status report (doc. no. 11) is construed as objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation. (2) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. no. 11) are overruled. (3) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 8) is adopted. (4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a final Federal Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 7th day of November, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.