Hendricks v. Gurley (INMATE 2), No. 2:2014cv00954 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 4 ) are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge& #039;s recommendation (doc. no. 3 ) is adopted; (3) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2 ) is denied; (4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may is sue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on February 19, 2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
Hendricks v. Gurley (INMATE 2) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LEONARD CHARLES HENDRICKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DR. JERRY GURLEY, ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv954-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 4) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 3) is adopted. (3) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2) is denied. (4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.