Carey v. Billups, et al. (INMATE 1)(LEAD), No. 2:2014cv00888 - Document 37 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 32 ) is adopted; (2) The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 28 ) is denied; (3) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on February 19, 2015. (scn, )

Download PDF
Carey v. Billups, et al. (INMATE 1)(LEAD) Doc. 37 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CARLOS CAREY, #245045, Plaintiff, v. PHYLLIS BILLUPS, et al., Defendants. CARLOS CAREY, #245045, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants. CARLOS CAREY, #245045, Plaintiff, v. FRANETTA RILEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-888-MHT ) (WO) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-948-MHT ) (WO) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-955-MHT ) (WO) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER This case is now before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The motion contends that prison officials have been interfering with mail sent between the plaintiff and witnesses to this lawsuit. The United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com entered a recommendation denying the motion for failure to meet the legal standard applicable on a motion for preliminary injunction. No objections to the recommendation have been received. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, it is ORDERED that: (1) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 32) is adopted. (2) The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 28) is denied. (3) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson___________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.