Nelson v. Haynes et al (INMATE 2)(DISCOVERY STAYED), No. 2:2014cv00855 - Document 48 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) the 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) plf's 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied; (3) this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/19/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Nelson v. Haynes et al (INMATE 2)(DISCOVERY STAYED) Doc. 48 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION CURTIS EDWARD NELSON, Plaintiff, v. SGT. EDWARD D. HAYNES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv855-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied as moot. No objections have been filed. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 44) is adopted. 2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 28) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com 3. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson_____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
