McCall v. SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company, LLC (JOINT ASSIGN), No. 2:2014cv00588 - Document 69 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT re 61 joint stipulation of dismissal without prejudice; it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the following dft is dismissed without prejudice and terminated as a party, with costs taxed as paid: SSC Equity Holdings, LLC; All claims against dft SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company, LLC, d/b/a South Haven Health and Rehabilitation remain; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/4/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
McCall v. SSC Montgomery South Haven Operating Company, LLC (JOINT ASSIGN) Doc. 69 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LYNDON F. McCALL, Personal Representative of the Estate of Yvonne J. McCall, Deceased, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SSC MONTGOMERY SOUTH HAVEN ) OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, ) d/b/a South Haven Health ) and Rehabilitation Center, ) and SSC EQUITY HOLDINGS, ) LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv588-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant without to the prejudice joint (doc. stipulation no. 61), it of is dismissal the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the following defendant is dismissed without prejudice and terminated as a party, Holdings, with LLC. costs All taxed claims as paid: SSC against Equity defendant SSC Dockets.Justia.com Montgomery South Haven Operating Company, LLC, d/b/a South Haven Health and Rehabilitation remain. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 4th day of December, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Terms of Service