Goodrich v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2014cv00540 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER directing that, after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the 9 objection lacks merit and is hereby OVERRULED, because the Petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion; the 2 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/29/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
Goodrich v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION STEVEN WAYNE GOODRICH, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14cv-540-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #2), entered on June 24, 2014, and the Petitioner’s Argument in Opposition (Doc. #9), filed on July 28, 2014. After an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the objection lacks merit and is hereby OVERRULED, because the Petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 29th day of July, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.