Lynn v. White, et al. (MAG+), No. 2:2014cv00379 - Document 35 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of that the United States Magistrate Judge's recommendations (doc. nos. 31 & 33 ) are adopted to the following exte nt: (1) Defendants Crenshaw County Sheriff Department's and Crenshaw County Jail's motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 11 and 25 ) are granted; (2) Defendants Crenshaw County Sheriff Department and Crenshaw County Jail are dismissed and termin ated as parties; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on March 16, 2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
Lynn v. White, et al. (MAG+) Doc. 35 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LARRY LYNN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CRENSHAW COUNTY SHERIFF ) DEPARTMENT, CRENSHAW ) COUNTY JAIL, RONNIE WHITE, ) JERRY PRITCHARD, and TERRY ) MEARS, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv379-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of that the United States Magistrate Judge's recommendations (doc. nos. 31 & 33) are adopted to the following extent: (1) Defendants Crenshaw County Sheriff Department’s and Crenshaw County Jail’s motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 11 and 25) are granted. Dockets.Justia.com (2) Defendants Crenshaw County Sheriff Department and Crenshaw County Jail are dismissed and terminated as parties. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 16th day of March, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.