Figaro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2014cv00358 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, and against the Plaintiff, Vincent Paul Figaro, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/18/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

Figaro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION VINCENT PAUL FIGARO, #263335, Plaintiff, vs. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14cv358-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, and against the Plaintiff, Vincent Paul Figaro, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE this 18th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.