Figaro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2014cv00358 - Document 18 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15 ) is GRANTED; (2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice; (3) No costs are taxed; (4) Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/18/14. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Figaro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION VINCENT PAUL FIGARO, #263335, Plaintiff, vs. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-358-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15) and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on August 27, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15) is GRANTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. No costs are taxed. 4. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. DONE this 18th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
