Braxton v. Aerotek, Inc. (MAG+), No. 2:2014cv00091 - Document 18 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/28/2014. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANTONIUS BRAXTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AEROTEK, INC., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv91-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On July 9, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 16). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this the 28th day of July, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
