Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, et al. (MAG+), No. 2:2013cv00849 - Document 34 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 32 ) is adopted; (2) Defendan ts' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 16 ) is granted; (3) The remaining claims in this lawsuit are dismissed with prejudice; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/8/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, et al. (MAG+) Doc. 34 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BILL LIETZE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv849-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 32) is adopted. (2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 16) is granted. (3) The dismissed remaining claims in this lawsuit are with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 8th day of May, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.