Taylor v. Estes et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2013cv00681 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's 20 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 17 Recommendation is adopted. (3) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed againstpetitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuantto Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/22/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
Taylor v. Estes et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JAQUINE ROBERTO TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DEWAYNE ESTES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv681-TMH (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 20) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 22nd day of May, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.