Naylor v. Fasion et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00645 - Document 42 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING R 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING as follows: (1) defs' 14 , 19 , 23 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; (2) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) judgment is ENTERED in favor of defs and against the plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/12/16. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ZERRICK MONET NAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. SECURITY SERVICE OFFICER CHRIS FAISON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-645-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On August 17, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 41. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 14, 19, 23) are GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Done, this 12th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
