Barley v. Houston et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00534 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the order entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/16/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

Barley v. Houston et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL M. BARLEY, #260 262, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY RANDALL V. HOUSTON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv534-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this 16th day of December, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.