Hastings v. Drake (INMATE 1), No. 2:2013cv00418 - Document 97 (M.D. Ala. 2016)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order of the court entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/13/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF

Hastings v. Drake (INMATE 1) Doc. 97 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND D. HASTINGS, #135351, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH DRAKE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-418-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 13th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.