Fuller v. Nearer et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00417 - Document 63 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 60 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1) Dfts' 25 , 27 , and 39 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 2) Plf's supplemental state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Dfts and against the Plf; 5) Costs are taxed against Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/12/2016. (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID BOY FULLER, #147 862, ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13-CV-417-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. LT. NEARER, et al., Defendants. OPINION and ORDER On August 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 60. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 25, 27, 39) are GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s supplemental state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff. 5. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Done, this 12th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
