Reeves v. Colvin, No. 2:2013cv00337 - Document 18 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:(1) The unopposed motion to reverse and remand 16 is granted. (2) The decision of defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and this case is remanded pursuan t to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security, for which execution may i ssue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/23/2013. (jg, ) Certified copy mailed to SSA Chief Judge and SSA Admin.

Download PDF
Reeves v. Colvin Doc. 18 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROGER REEVES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv337-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The unopposed motion to reverse and remand (doc. no. 16) is granted. (2) The decision of defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against defendant Acting Commissioner of Social Security, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 23rd day of December, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.