Rogers v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00227 - Document 26 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Respondents, and against Petitioner, and this 28 USC 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of the order entered this day; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/29/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rogers v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JASON E. ROGERS, #254 032, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BOYD, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13-CV-227-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the order of the court entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondents, and against Petitioner, and this 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of the order entered this day. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 29th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
