Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)(NO DISCOVERY), No. 2:2013cv00188 - Document 448 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Dfts, and against the Plf, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Costs are taxed against the Plf; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/19/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)(NO DISCOVERY) Doc. 448 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS RADFORD #156846, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:13-cv-188-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 19th day of July, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
