Hockaday v. Calvin et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00120 - Document 8 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER and OPINION that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) The 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against defendants is DISMISSED pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(B)(1); (2) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process.. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/7/13. (djy, )

Download PDF
Hockaday v. Calvin et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SCOTTY DALE HOCKADAY, #181616, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) OFFICER TERRENCE CALVIN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv120-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On May 28, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 7). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendants is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(B)(1); 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Done this the 7th day of August, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs ________________________________________ TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.