Livingston v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2013cv00070 - Document 43 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION stating that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/06/14. (scn, ) Modified on 11/6/2014 to change ORDER to OPINION pursuant to PDF document (scn, ).

Download PDF
Livingston v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 43 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN C. LIVINGSTON, #207956, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN III GARY HETZEL, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv70-MHT (WO) OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this failure of the protect him from lawsuit defendant an attack complaining correctional by his about the officers to cellmate. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s case be dismissed. recommendation. review of the There are no objections to the After record, an the independent court and concludes de novo that the magistrate judge’s recommendation should be adopted. Dockets.Justia.com An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 6th day of November, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.