Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00068 - Document 26 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby AD OPTED; that the Plaintiff's claims against the claims against the Montgomery County Detention Facility be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); that the Montgomery County Detention Fa cility be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; and the Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 5/13/13. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID OLIVER, #285 230 Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-0068-TMH [wo] OPINION and ORDER On March 18, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 17). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; that the Plaintiff s claims against the claims against the Montgomery County Detention Facility be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); that the Montgomery County Detention Facility be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; and the Plaintiff s claims against the remaining defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Done this the 13th day of May, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
