Goff v. State Military Department (MAG+)(DISCOVERY), No. 2:2013cv00060 - Document 75 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 73 ) are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 72 ) is adopted; (3) Defendants motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 58 & 66 ) are granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Goff v. State Military Department (MAG+)(DISCOVERY) Doc. 75 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SHANNON GOFF, Plaintiff, v. STATE MILITARY DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv60-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 73) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 72) is adopted. (3) Defendant’s motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 58 & 66) are granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
