Moore v. Rowells et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2013cv00034 - Document 5 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judgebe and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the Complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED prior to service of process, and that the § 1983 claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and that the state law claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/26/2013. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLES E. MOORE, #180 583, Plaintiff, v. WILLIE ROWELL, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-34-TMH [wo] OPINION and ORDER On January 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case dismissing this case prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the Complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED prior to service of process, and that the § 1983 claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and that the state law claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.. Done this the 26th day of February, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
