Boissonneau v. United States of America ( INMATE 3), No. 2:2013cv00020 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 5 opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) Petitioner Sean Michael Boissonneau's pro se motions for a concurrent sentence (Doc. Nos. 2 and 3 ) are treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and said petition is granted; (2) The judgment in United States v. Boissonneau, criminal action number 2:10cr176-MHT (Doc. No. 38) (M.D.Ala.), is amended to reflect t hat the sentence is concurrent with the sentence issued in the Montgomery County, Alabama, Circuit Court, Case No. CC-08-648, as further set out; further ORDERED that the parties are to bear their own costs; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Boissonneau v. United States of America ( INMATE 3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SEAN MICHAEL BOISSONNEAU, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv020-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: (1) Petitioner Sean Michael Boissonneau’s pro se motions for a concurrent sentence (Doc. Nos. 2 and 3) are treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and said petition is granted. (2) The judgment in United States v. Boissonneau, criminal action number 2:10cr176-MHT (Doc. No. 38) (M.D. Ala.), is amended to reflect that the sentence is concurrent with the sentence issued in the Montgomery County, Alabama, Circuit Court, Case No. CC-08-648. This amendment is nunc pro tunc, meaning that the amendment is Dockets.Justia.com effective as of the date of the original judgment in the criminal case. It further ORDERED that the parties are to bear their own costs. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 8th day of January, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
