Reynolds v. Ocean Bio Chem/Kinpak, Inc. (MAG+)(DISCOVERY), No. 2:2012cv01101 - Document 38 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: 1. The 37 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendant's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; and 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/5/2014. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DENISE MARIE REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, v. OCEAN BIO CHEM/KINPAK, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1101-MEF-TFM ) (WO) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On January 9, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. #37). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #26) be and is hereby GRANTED; and 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. DONE this the 5th day of February, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
